Peter Farber, a real Democrat

a moderate, even a radical moderate

a problem solver, a principled, tough, decision maker, a leader

I used to refer to myself as a radical moderate and after some renewed deliberation and some pretty deep soul-searching, I have decided to run this way and describe myself as a radical moderate.

What is a radical moderate?

 A radical moderate is someone who wants more than anything else to solve problems - to make things better, to help advance society. Radical moderates are not in the business of throwing stones, casting blame or engaging in name calling. Radical moderates are not centrists fence sitters with our values or priorities, but the highest priority of a radical moderate is to identify what is possible - the art of politics - and then to work towards that goal in the here and now, not pursue that which is not possible for the sake of being proud of themselves, garnering attention or in some ways just showing off. Politics is hard work. We need more radical moderates in the halls of power. I would like to be one.

 Radical moderates realize that people disagree. They acknowledge, admit and respect that people have different perspectives, values and understandings. They believe deeply that such diversity is normal healthy, good, right, free, just, moral, - as it should be and ou of their diversity we become one, e pluribus unum.

Radical moderate politics is not about the politics of 'but, 'if' or 'should' or 'could. It's not about the politics of well maybe or however or just wait a minute or wouldn’t this be better. These words never lead to real problem solving. They allow people to be angry and frustrated; they allow people to dig in and be determined - to be principles in all the wrong ways - to be defensive and I do not believe that the way people truly want to be. People want to be in the process. They want to be included. They want their voices to be heard. They want their voices to be heard in a way that truly matters not just thrown out of some suggestion box or told hey thank you great idea and then ignored.

Radical moderatism is about taking those ideas and the voices that create them and making them into policies that can work at a given time as best as possible in the real world were we live. And this is why I am entering the race. This is why I'm running. This is why I'm running now as a radical moderate.

I'm not here to solve this problem or that one. I'm not a one issue candidate. My passion is not really about education or Israel or China or any of those things really - my true passion is to help in the problem-solving process so that all people can contribute to making their towns, cities, villages, hamlets, state and nation a better pace.

Peter Farber’s academic credentials and other relevant experience

(For a more detailed employment survey including reasons for changing positions - please see my FB page)

like Hakeem Jeffries, Democratic House Minority Leader, Mr. Farber studied Political Science (International Relations) and graduated with Outstanding Academic Achievement Honors from Binghamton University - SUNY B. He also studied for a semester in Madrid, Spain

Mr. Farber attended the The Graduate Center of the City University of New York where he studied Political Science towards his PhD, but left

Queens College, CUNY - Masters in Social Studies Education

Travel other related experience

individual travel to more than 40 countries including India, Bangladesh, Vietnam, Indonesia, Malaysia, Turkey, Israel, Egypt, Hungary, Macedonia, Croatia, Trinidad and Tobago, most of western Europe, the United States, the Caribbean and Canada

reader and writer, gym goer shout out to Planet Fitness, public park walker, especially riverside parks, cat lover and above all else, lover of children all of all ages

summer camp counselor for five year olds during my teenage years

summer vacation trip leader for developmentally disabled adults

Habilitation specialist for developmentally disabled adults

father, son, brother, brother-in-law, uncle, cousin great nephew

words about Peter Farber

Peter you can’t change the world - English teacher Lakeland High School

Go change the world, Peter - teacher of 2e children in a recent faculty meeting

I dont want to see you again until you have your PhD - Edward Weisband, Distinguished Teaching Professor, Binghamton University, 1987 New York Professor of the Year, gold medal finalist National Professor of the Year

a born philosopher - Dankwart Alexander Rustow, Distinguished Professor of Political Science and Sociology, Graduate Center of the City University of NY

No real response to my question: What makes economies go? - Professor of Japanese Political Economy, Columbia University

Just let Farber go last - Binghamton University College Democrats debate team strategy

one of the smartest people I have ever met - Psychiatrist from Russia

You’re not crazy, you are the most sane one in a mixed-up, crazy world - father

You are really good at this. Are you in a Masters in Administration program - former Principal

The kids really like you. You don’t know that? For a smart guy, you’re kinda dumb. What are you doing here? - former colleague- social studies teacher

You’re like an American Kongzi (confucius) - Chinese colleague 20 years ago

I love when you sing songs - child in online Karaoke Club

I/ we really like your class - more than a few students of all ages, parents too

You should be a lawyer - a Queens College Professor in the Education Dept.

Peter, you should have your own radio show - a close friend of mine

Good students need good teachers too - hiring committee teacher, Brooklyn Technical High School

Get students; keep students - my words re: private school education leaders

Mrs. Johnson, Peter says he doesn’t like you because you yell at the bad kids - told to me by my mother in response to Mrs. Johnson, my 1st grade teacher

Mr. Do you know why? - name given to me by my Chinese students

fang si yuan (think into the future) Chinese name given me by Chinese partner

wei ming hu - (lake with no name) my first Chinese name, name of lake at Beijing University, given to me by a student I met during my first trip to China

laoP - (older/wiser P) what I was typically called during my time in China

and a special honorary shout out goes to Ms. zou guan na from ping ding shan in China’s central Henan province for her response to the following:

Did you know, zouguanna, that in Afghanistan, girls can not go to school? To which she replied, “Can I go there?”

Farber 2024

Democrat for Congress

responsible, reasonable, compassionate

Please see my FB page for detailed information about my experience and my rationale for my career path

Thanks so much, Peter (12/17/23 - 12:50 am)

New material for you to consider

- Monday, December 11, 2023

Leisure time - just 2 hours a week, ok? Or how about just 1

Imagine if we all took 2 hours a week to do the following reading writing and exercising instead of just 2 hours of consuming some music, some videos some food some social media - just 2 hours a week. How’s that for radical moderatism?

Wouldn’t our health rates soar? Wouldn’t our minds would sharpen, our hearts widen or souls deepen? Wouldn’t our relationships would improve?

How do we use our leisure time?  How do you?

Is the watching, the scrolling, of endless sites and sounds in our eyes and ears really enjoyable? Does it make us feel good?  Does it make us happy? Or are we - you I all us - just too addicted to the sights, sounds and smells that calm our nerves but don't really calm our minds, hearts and souls?

We state, we bemoan, we cry out that many of us are addicted to social media can we fight it? How about we start real real small? How about a national campaign which we work towards together where each commit to read write and exercise for a total of just 2 hours per week instead of using that time for scrolling listening chatting or even less eating - our national health -  mental, physical, emotional spiritual - would soar. We don’t need social spending for this, just a commitment to ourselves as individuals and to each each other as a nation seeking better health.

But guess what I don’t even think we need that much? 2 hours per week nit per day, nust 2 hours per week of an adjustment would be necessary to change our selves and our direction. Lets shoot for just 1 hour- just 1 hour per week of a redirected effort away from addictive behavior towards growth and productive behavior: read for just 20 more minutes per week, write for just 20 more minutes per week and exercise for just 20 more minutes per week. If we want to scare the Chinese and the Russians and any one else from messing with us. This is the way to do it. All our enemies would be terrified. Wouldn’t we be if all our adversaries did the same?

That’s it just 1 hour per week - a plan towards a healthier rejuvenated nation - cost $0.00.

A transition from a passive addicted lifestyle towards a happier productive, active lifestyle.

Add 20 minutes per week of reading

Add 20 minutes per week of writing

Add 20 minutes per week or exercise

A plan that could transform our nation. We might just save a few dollars on health care costs, eh?ya think Any doctors therapists or social media profiteers would be terrified. The ones who truly care about us would cheer this plan from the rooftops and encourage us to stick to it.

Think about how many commercials or shows of any kind tell us to read more. There are almost none Some shows or program may highlight books, maybe hold up some copies here or there, but do they ever really suggest we take the time to read those books, any books or really read anything at all. Not as far as I can see. Why? Because reading is the enemy of consumer culture.

Writing, oh my writing, is an even greater enemy

Where as reading deepens the heart, writing sharpens the mind.

Reading and writing. Never almost never do you hear the media tell us to do these activities.

If you think about it and I well do.  All those news shows succeed only if only because  we don’t read...The cable news shows that draw millions of watchers every night basically do one thing.

They tell us what the newspapers say. They do the reading for us and they talk to us, like we are children - like we are infant and we let them.  We actually watch TV and let mediallionaires ( a new word - I like it) read to us. Why do we need them to tell us what was in the newspaper?

Do they really think we can’ t read? Do they really think their insights or so profound - that we cant read and think for ourselves. The media actually doesn’t want us to read. If we read, we wouldn’t need their “grown ups” to sit in their studies basically alone except for cameras, lighting and sophisticated production facilities to read to us like we are children. Note the use of the term production. Our produced media are like our processed food. We don’t need either one. We should avoid both as much as possible. They are doing this to earn from us - not to help us.

Turn off the cable TV for just 20 minutes and read. Stop scrolling for just 20 minutes and write. Put down a snack for 20 minutes and exercise - just 1 hour per week. That’s all we need to do.

An annual Mental Health exam

The medical establishment recommends that we all have an annual physical exam. Frankly, I think mental health is as important - if not really a lot, lot, lot more important than physical health. Our brains, our minds - the most complex organ on earth - determines so much of what we do, how we feel, our ability to live well and happily - to make the most of our lives - that I advocate the funding of annual mental health exams.

This is not something that should frighten anyone. I don’t think we are all going crazy or anything like that. Its not a big thing really.  Maybe a mental health professional would sit down with each American for 30-45 minutes once a year and ask a series of rather simple questions about how you are or have been feeling over the past several weeks, month or even the whole year. That’s all. And then maybe each American would answer these questions according to say  a scale from 1-10. Afterwards or even during this period, the person, his or her loved ones and a mental health professional would have a very basic understanding of something as simple as how are you feeling - other wise known as your mental health.  Sound painful? I don’t think so. Some dentists out there might be thinking. I’m so jealous  (I have a few dentists in family.)

The unbelievable number of lives saved would be enormous. The degree of life dissatisfaction saved would be even more ginormous, and the cost miniscule, even a fraction of that I think.

Let assume that out of every 100 people who take part in such a mental health annual, 90 people provide answers which suggest to themselves and their mental health professional that they are and have been feeling find, no worried, they seem satisfied with their lives, their work, family relationships, friends and the like and like the year before they pass the exam with flying colors and thats it. MHP says, ok Take care and see you next year. Patient thinks boy that was easy, maybe the easiest exam I ever passed and I didn’t even study.

Now lets say 7 out of 100 express some stress, some doubt, some anxiety, some worry, some dissatisfaction with their lives that captures their own attention - to frankly - their own surprise. While everyone has family and friends its not typical for family and friends to ask you questions about your sleeping patterns or concentration or questions like do you ever feel like you are letting your family down or that you aren’t really so valuable? For  mentally healthy folks these questions can seem almost preposterous and that;s actually almost a sign of mental health. It can appear to mentally health people like they are almost being asked, by the way did you find did you cancerous lump under your breast this morning or did you spit up any blood this week?  Friends and family even close friends and family member do not ask such questions. Mental health professionals ask these questions every day all the time do and they are trained to do it well. It might seem simple and it can be, ut like regular health professionals its paying attention to subtleties that make all the difference and can be the difference between life and death.

So finally after the series of questions is over these 7 individuals and their mental health professionals realize that maybe the individuals needs to spend a but more time on self care. Maybe take a few more walks each week. Maybe eat better. Maybe spend more time chatting with close friends and at the end they decide hey lets shat back in 6 months ok? Potential life saved right there for how much? Not a life saved by saving someone from suicide but a life saved by letting the person know that their feelings have become a bit unhealthy and they should try to take care and thinks can improve with some attention and maybe not much else

How about the other 3 out of 100. I think by now you can see where this is going.

Lets say 2 of them give answers that lead the individuals to exhibit serious signs of stress. The mental health professional wont be the only one to notice this Maybe the individual even starts to cry when he or she hears her own answers to questions that maybe no one has ever asked.

He or she realizes with the mental health professional that this person needs some help and fast.  They agree to maybe have a visit or two er week over the next several weeks or months to provide some support. If thats snot enough maybe a mental heath professional might recommend that a medical doctor with training in mental heath that dreaded word psychiatrist intervened and maybe offers some medicine for the individual to take along with the once or twice weekly sessions. Remember these days those sessions can be held online, no office visits necessary. After a few months the individual and his or her mental health professional see clear patterns of improved health and another life is saved, and not just one, because that person has loved ones. Their lives are also saved. Maybe 10 or 20 lives are saved. The cost - negligible.

Now we have the 1/100 person who remains. Is this person crazy? Its a meaningless question. Mental health professionals never engage with this kind of language. Its irrelevant to their task. Is this 1/100 person suffering? Yes. And the individual probably knew in some way long before their annual mental health exam that they weren’t feeling well but maybe they didn’t know what was wrong or that something really was very wrong. Maybe they weren’t able to sleep well or they couldn’t concentrate well enough to watch their favorite shows, or listen to their favorite songs, or weren’t able to read to their children the way they always used to enjoy doing. Maybe they weren’t able to enjoy time with family and friends they way they used to.  Basically their life was deteriorating and quite possibly they had no idea why or that anyone out there could possibly help them.

For mental health professionals, like other health professionals, the why, the reason behind illness, doesn’t matter. Health practitioners focus on helping people get the care they need so they can feel better. Itss really rather simple. Just as a physical doctor doesn’t care (at first of course) how you broke your leg or why you developed AIDS, their job is to give you the care -  medicine, treatment whatever it is - so you can feel better and the sooner the better. Its really that simple.  Just as physical doctors don't judge you for getting lung cancer (they might after you start recovering and offer suggestions; the mental health professional does not just you fo your feelings. It doesn't matter to them why you feel bad. Their job is to help you feel better and if they can do it well they are good at what they do and if they cant they aren’t. Case closed.

So back to that 1/100 who is suffering and suffering in extraordinary pain. He or she might have been crying everyday for weeks or quite possibly multiple times a day. If someone tells you that a person who is crying multiple times a day or week for an extended period of time is not suffering, I hope that person won;’t apply to become my best friend any time soon.

Can this kind of suffering be treated? Absolutely. Will every one recover and feel perfectly healthy once again.Most likely not  People who get to this point may need care and attention for the rest of their life, but they likely won’t die from mental illness ever. He or she might need to enter the hospital right away. They might need to stay with others and not be left alone for days, weeks or even longer. They might need medicine to help their pain, dress and suffering, but the person’s will have been saved by their annual mental health exam. Have I made my point?

Enough writing for today. I have some issues I plan to write about tomorrow.

Please consider supporting Farber for Congress. Thank you.

Traffic Jams: Part 1.

I’ve been working hard on this one tonight for the last couple of hours. It’s getting a bit long and I’m kinda tired so I’ll publish it now and call it Part 1 and work on what I’ll call Part 2 tomorrow. Good evening from Farber for Congress Headquarters in New York. [I also used AI to help me write this one. Thanks to someone out there for the idea.]

If I could solve one problem in the New York metropolitan area, I could become so popular that I might be able to get a new district created in Washington DC called the New York Metropolitan Area and get elected Governor on my first try. Which problem is that? Traffic.

Oh my god. Is there a problem that affects more grown-up suburbanites every day than traffic?  A problem that for many doesn’t even actually count as a problem, It's just an accepted part of reality, like rain, summer humidity, or underperforming New York sports teams. Does it have to be this way? Maybe, or maybe not. I dare not claim to be a transportation expert and I know there must be a logic to urban transportation planning, but if there is any more despised but necessary person than the weather woman who reports that which she can not control, it must be the dreaded transportation reporter who essentially does the same.

Where can we start? Again I am not a suburban transportation expert nor do I claim to be one, but if I were elected to office these are some of the questions I’d want answered or I’d want people referring me to books, articles, and other materials to me, so that I could begin to think hard and fast about how to solve this seemingly intransigent problem.  If I ever had free time, and I wasn’t working on how to help our kids have better days in school. I'd be working on the traffic jam issue thinking about how to save more of that most valuable resource - time.

Now before the idealist hopefuls say we just need more public transportation, please spare me. People have to drive to their homes in the suburbs. That was how our society was built and no amount of commuter rails is going to change this. Sure we should encourage rail use as much as possible, but people will still drive. They need to drive and we shouldn't make driving an evil. As a public official, it would be my job to try to improve people’s lives, not wish that people were angels, or any other such drivel.

Believe it or not, I think the place to begin is with speed limits and their corresponding signs. If there is anything that teaches suburban folks - young, well not so young, and old - that government is either incompetent, dishonest, foolishly idealistic or, some such combination it is the ubiquitous and wholly and completely dishonest speed limit sign.

Why do we have to have speed limits that mean nothing? Is it written in our Constitution or inscribed upon tablets given to Moses on Mount Sinai? Commandment # 11: Thou shall have wholly dishonest speed limit signs. Do we do this to make ourselves or someone, feel good? Is there some hope among some Ivory Towerists out there that if we just keep posting completely arbitrary speed limit signs everywhere that, somehow, someway, someday,  some small group of people, maybe like 10 or 20 per year, will abide by them so we can feel some kind of puerile,  higher than thou - victory. If the Ivory Towerists can ride their e-bikes across campus to class, good for them, but many people still have to drive to work every day.

So why not be honest? Make laws and post signs that are accurate and truthful speed limits. What a concept! Tell the truth and then hold people accountable if they break actual laws?

New Material to Consider - Tuesday, December 12, 2023 (11:30 pm)

a Part 1 “My Vindmans” (part 2 of the story tomorrow, or so I say)

Have an interesting story to share with everyone tonight. Two new folks have entered my world our world, the world of Farber 2024. One is famous to some, but not so famous to others.  The other may be known to many, but his name itself seems to keep him a secret to almost everyone.  I don’t know, but it sure seems puzzling to me.

The first gentleman is one of the most powerful men in the world I think we could say, at least in the world of global finance, Chairman and CEO of JP Morgan Chase, Mr. Jamie Dimon. The second, Brandon H, answers the phone in Mr. Dimon’s office called “Executive” in Houston, Texas.

When I shared this story which I’m about to tell you all with some of my Farber2024 friends and supporters many didn’t know who, Mr Dimon, was. A few others who are with the campaign, but not as or so close to it in some other ways yet did.  Some of the people closest to me now in Farber2024 are first-generation immigrants trying to make their way in the US and aren’t as familiar with the titans of global finance.  They have their own hurdles to climb, learning English, adapting to culture, caring for families who know even less English, and are struggling to hold on to past cultures - language and traditions - as they see their children becoming American and who need to do so to survive and thrive - so they can take care of those relatives who cant and dont want to truly let go of their past - and understandably so. This is a truly American story - if not the American story. If you and yours can’t relate, I bet way back when maybe a few generations ago or even more this story was part of your family’s history too. Of course, many who came to America didn’t have the luxury of such suffering. There’s is the African American story of forced immigration; often referred to more compellingly as slavery and the slave trade.

One day many, maybe even most of these highly courageous, hard-working principled immigrant folks on my team who don’t know who Mr. Jamie Dimon is today will get there.  They will succeed and live a life they can only today dream of.  For others, the hill will be too high to climb and either their children or their children’s children will have to carry the torch over their troubled waters towards success in a new golden valley.  If they are not able to succeed but they pass on the hope, the spirit, and the belief in America, one day their success will come. Of this, I have no doubt.

The others who are with Farber 2024, but are not necessarily so close in a kind of everyday interaction with me, were born into more successful families. Many have already reached the pinnacle, or have approached the pinnacle, of their intended fields: science, the arts, business, journalism, technology, government, social welfare - you name it. If these folks who are with me but a bit on the upside circle so far haven’t yet reached the absolute peak of their profession, the reasons are related to luck, choice, or something else like it - an unexpected death in the family for example. Their lack of ultimate success, is not, due to their their lack of effort, their principles, their character, or their integrity They are as rock solid as they come - my Vindmans.


Something new to consider The Joe Farber Reform Plan

Hello,

The last few days I’ve been spending time updating my social media pages. I still don’t have a Twitter (X) account or an Instagram account. I’m not tick-tocking or whatever else. If this is stuff going on in these social media spheres that's fine, but I don't know about it and so far that's been fine.  Maybe I’ll get in that social media universe and some point,  but so far just my campaign website and FB page have been enough for me to communicate and I've made a lot of progress in a pretty short time, I've only been at this since I think the end of November, about 3 weeks ago this coming Sunday, November 19 when I decided I wanted to fun for political office.

I’ve updated my FB work experience page significantly over the last 24-48 hours so folks can see my work experience and sort of track my life’s career with its challenges and its accomplishments - rather,  a few challenges I think if you take a look. Some accomplishments, but rather a lot of frustrations and disappointments I should say. Hopefully, that has prepared me well for a life in politics where a lot of people who don't know my intentions, challenge my integrity and the like. I know who I am and I think that's really, important for anyone and everyone - especially for someone or anything who is about to enter public life. This might be my last significant entry before my public life status goes from a few people more than my friends and family have heard of me to maybe a lot of people who I don't know and will never meet have heard of me. That's I think the true challenge of being in politics. How to keep your focus, maintain your dignity, purpose, and calm while others are throwing sticks and stones at you even when they don't know who you, really are.  Maybe they will be taking out their life frustrations and disappointments on you, at the bar cruising your (I should say now - my name when they see it on the TV thinking ah just another politician, they’re all the same,  everyone's a liar and a scumbag just like the rest of them. Care? care? They don't care about anyone or anything other than themselves. Why don't they get a real job instead of living off us hard-working folks?  Government, it'd be better if we just shut the whole thing down, right? And then everyone in this private area shows how courageous they are and says, Yeah yeah god gamut, If we were in power that'd be different. We'll show them a thing or two. We’d just give all of the tax money back to everyone and things would just be perfect. Well, something like that.  So that is my contribution to the X or whatever for the night. Maybe someone can cut and paste that, make a meme or what have you from my words above and use that whenever they hear or see someone mocking me or maybe some other hard-working politicians who are really, trying their best to make the world or their slice of the world just a little bit better.  OK like I said enough for that. Yeah I'm trying to prepare myself and it's gonna be tough, but I'm ready for it and maybe soon I’ll have a few allies to help me too.

What I  want to write about today, and if I can focus maybe for the next several days even unto the Holiday season week, where I think I might take a break from all this, as we could or should - are two topics that I'd like to write about distinctly. but also in combination. I think these two topics outside of China are most important to me and. to our future as I see it.

One is education reform.  Until we change our education system and make it a 21st educational system we will do a lot of damage to our kids, families, and, our country. Some minor adjustments really won't do the trick. It will take a lot of hard work and time to accomplish some of what I'm going to suggest. There will be pain and hardship, frustration, anger, and resentment as we transition from a system that paid us dividends last century but no longer does now. The second topic sounds abstract but is to me at the heart of what I think can help our politics. I want to take some time to look into the idea of conservative, what it is, what it can mean, and how that term has been corrupted. I don't dislike all conservatives, conservative people are and can be some of the kindest, most generous, most giving people you can ever meet. They love their families dearly, are incredibly patriotic, give to charities by the millions, even the tens of millions -  I mean if you are a lefty and think to be conservative means to be a bad person - you, really need to think again and hopefully, this will show at least my understanding of what and how conservatism and conservatives can be good - even though I am not one myself. I can tell you one of my favorite people in the world well she's not, actually a people, not a person at all - she's my cat, and she’s conservative. For all of you animal lovers out there, consider whether or not your pet, your beloved cat or dog is conservative. I'd venture to say that more likely than not he or she is.

Huh?  Your cat or dog loves you to death, is fiercely loyal, and when in an environment where he or she feels safe can be as free, as open, and as loving as any creature that walks on this earth. Yet put that same creature in an environment of uncertainty, watch out, she or he will bark like there’s no tomorrow, howl or claw, or as is the case with my beloved Mel, run like the dickens to her favorite hiding spot or series of spots if one is somehow between the fear causing element and her nearest safe place in my house under the sofa or bed, Maybe the same for you.

Maybe you are wondering if I'm saying can’t a big old cat or pet or any animal be liberal?  If you think about it now, really, well not so much. Are there some pets, some animals who are willing to risk their life for the sake of others who are unknown to them?  Doesn't sound like the kind of special animal or pet that I know.  Can you imagine your lovely kitty willingly sharing some of her food or water with another kitty that has a bit of a foreign smell, again. Unlikely? How about Fido or whatever you call your lovely canine? Would she be willing to share her bone with someone she has barely met, never met at all, or, has only maybe seen once or twice -  for the good of being well a good pup?  I don't think so, right? Animals by their nature are conservative and guess what? We are animals too. So if you lefties out there are wondering why how golly gee willikers how could anyone in their right mind be conservative start with your pet and his or her life and maybe that can be a way to help - maybe it can be a way to help us build a bridge that every day for certainly the last several years if not more has been destroying us even when deep down we don't really, want it to. I know for many it seems like we want it to, But I'm pretty sure pretty confident that deeper down deeper than the deep you have looked so far, but way deep down even a little deeper, there is a desire to want to like your liberal or conservative neighbor so that you and he or she and you can enjoy time together in that strange sphere we call humanity.

Ok so I will as I said use more time to dig into that topic in the coming days and as I said I'd like to at, some times merge my comments about educational reform with my thoughts on conservatism, but at other times keep them distinct because I think it will be useful to use the ideas about conservatism in other sphere of life and public policy that aren't related to education. On the other hand, I think that to get educational reform right we must include and incorporate conservative ideas and principles not to appease or merely satisfy the right but because conservative principles have their merit and value and without them, the reform won’t work and won't be right. Sorry if this disappoints some of my supporters or potential supporters on the political left. Remember I'm here to solve problems not to be ideologically right.

So here are some raw suggestions or goals that I think we need to consider moving towards to make our education system coincide with the realities of twenty-first-century life.  Before you laugh, cackle or think my ideas are crazy, immature, or wild, please hear me out. This will be a debate and struggle like no other possibly during my entire political career if I am to last that long.

1 - This is probably the most important reform of all, bear none, and will scare the living bejesus out of many many folks on the right, left and, center so here we go, are you ready?

1 We must let kids graduate from high school at the ripe old age of 16.  What Farber are you crazy 16, our kids aren't even ready to fill in the blank at the age of 24 these days. Yeah, yeah I know and that's exactly the problem and why we need such a solution. We have done so much damage to so many people's families, friends, institutions, etc., by allowing the teenage creation which never existed before to become the 20age creation.  I know I know people are like Farber you are out of your mind, but you will see and I think everyone will see this can and should work.

I’d like to take a moment or two, if you’ll allow me to digress, reflect on, and, write about arguably the singularly most important influence on my life. I have not mentioned this force yet and it seems as things get closer to becoming quite real for me to acknowledge the contribution that this force has made to my life and if I’m able to influence the direction of our great state nation, or even to some extent this world much credit must be due to him - my dad, Joseph Martin Farber, may he rest in peace.  My dad and I battled for ages for decades and even until his dying day about 10 years ago, could not get right with each other. I remember some of his last words to me and it made me feel like I wanted to end him right then and there. If you are wondering how he could have been a positive influence or even an influence or significance that I would mention here (as I wipe some tears from my eyes)  I think I understand him more now after his passing than I ever did while he was alive. This in no way excuses him for his behavior that I often found repulsive, pathetic, and downright mean, but as I said I feel I understand more of how he became the way he was and how that was and is so at odd with who and how I am. It is almost for this reason and I will explain more as I go along that if possible if one day some of the legislation or even yes constitutional amendments that I will suggest here if ever come to fruition, I would be honored if in some way my Dad’s name could be a part of that history. How’s that Dad for some respect? What do you think? (a few more tears)

If you are wondering how all of these things could possibly, fit together, educational reform conservatism and my Dad as I said I’ll try to explain all of this and put it all together over the coming days but in essence, we need to treat our children like adults even we need to treat our adults like adults if we want to rebuild our nation and lead ourselves forward to a better world.

We have fallen into a deep and desperate trap by calling our twenty-somethings kids, which they are not.

They are only kids if we call them kids - if we allow them to be kids and they are not. How do I know? Because I know that even fifteen-year-olds can make babies. And as long as there is a God in heaven and whatever else, to me if you can make a baby you are an adult. It's as simple as that.

How I hear the anger the rabble-rousing, the all kinds of hatred coming my way, but I'm ready for it cause this is not an idea that just popped into my mind yesterday, It's a thought an idea that has come to me from the 30 years of working in the education system where the suffering the challenges the answers are nowhere to be found because the foundation has been shaken.

We have a system that was built for K-12 but we have allowed the 12 to become `14 and 16 and 18 and god knows how long until we now have people with college degrees who don't know how to do almost anything and it's not their fault. It's our fault, We are the adults in the room and we have to fix it. We owe it to them to fix it. We brought them into the world. They didn't choose to be here. We have to be the adults in the room. We have to make the hard choices to right this ship or the suffering will continue and if you think it can’t or won’t get worse, think again.

Why do you think for example we have so many school shootings?  It's not the guns. It's not the psychological problems of the kids. It's the frustration that they are stuck in a place where they don't belong, and they just can't bear to keep waiting to get out and be the adults that their bodies tell them they are.  In the pre-internet age, we could get away with this, but that age ended about 20 years ago and we haven't really, done bupkus to adjust since Email began.

Any sixteen-year-old now and don't tell me some don't have access to high-speed internet yadi yadi yadi (my inner Seinfeld. I’m in Queens now, after all ok?), any, ok well almost any sixteen-year-old in America can right now, at this very moment, get online with their phone and have access to more information within minutes than most people from the 20th century could have if you added up all of the time in their entire life. And yet we have these “teenagers” sitting in classrooms listening to teachers talk while reading books as if we were still living in the 1980s and we are not. We must change this and the sooner the better. This is how we stop the school shootings. This is how we stop the opioid crisis. This is how we stop the marijuana shops from opening in places like my Astoria Queens as fast as ... as fast as you name it.  By keeping adults in the lives of children unnaturally, we are doing tremendous damage to the entire social fabric of our nation and dare I say the world’s nations. To quote a rather famous line from a rather famous person from a rather famous book in my culture’s heritage “Let My People Go.'' There is no reason why we should continue to keep seventeen and eighteen-year-old men locked up in schools because they need to complete some credits. It is a travesty. It is a crime and we must end it, and the sooner the better.

At the age of sixteen, a man and a woman in today’s internet world can read and access information that they can use to lead their young lives. There is no reason they need to obtain more credits or even more diplomas before they can start their lives,  They might not want to have children at that age so in the past sixteen-year-olds in history were parents. In fact for the majority of human history, this was normal and entirely common, Only when we decided somehow that the best way to help our workforce was to keep kids in school so dad and then mom could go to work, but now everyone in the world of mind-word can work from wherever they are so the seventeen and eighteen-year-olds don't need to be locked up in school so Mom and Dad can go to work. Why? Because now Mom and Dad are working from home. They are free, but their poor kids are not. Terrible!

Now if Mom and Dad are not working from home and in many cases this is not the case then we make adjustments for this, but why are Mom and Dad now working from home as I do and have been for years, connected to any, and all technology that they need to do their mind work, while their kids have to go to school and use some of that old technology called cars and buses to get to a place where the internet that is at home or even not at home wherever they have their phone also is. It simply doesn't make any sense, anymore, and the sooner we right this wrong and get it straightened out I'm sure many other things will settle into place, but it will take time. Can twenty and, twenty-one-year olds have children? Yes, a man and a woman can graduate from high school at 16, enter a local community college either online or in person, and maybe take an Associate’s degree for 2 years. Then by the ripe old age of eighteen, he or she can find a job, get married maybe start a family by their early 20s. If at the age of sixteen, a young man and young woman wish to look for work and feel like their high school diploma provided them with enough knowledge and skills to find less mind-related work so be it, that's their choice and there ain’t nothin’ wrong with it. But let's not have them waste a few more years each and learn to feel bad about themselves because they can't do calculus or read The Federalist Papers.  Judge people by their character, their effort their kindness - not by how many degrees they have in god knows what.

If the young man and the young woman decide after they have finished their Associate’s degrees at the age of 18 that they might like to continue studying to pursue a Bachelor's Degree which will regain its rightful place in American history, unlike today where it gets you almost nothing, in many, but not all cases.  Please if you went to a top 100 or even top 200 college please, understand we are not talking about you here. We are talking about the folks, now the hundreds, thousands even millions of folks who either haven’t earned a high school diploma, earned one but it was too little too late, or by merely, just passing, it didn’t prepare them for work. These are the folks we need to worry about the most.

If at the age of twenty this young man and woman realize that with 2 more years of study, they have the opportunity to pursue work that is more interesting and meaningful to them and that by sacrificing two additional years of study and delaying for 2 more years the joys and challenges of family life they can jump their lives future to a higher level and they decided to enter a graduate program and earn a master's degree by the ripe old age of 22 or 23, we have a rebuilt America that will challenge any nation and be a model for how other nations can thrive in the 21st century.

Now if you think I've lost my mind, here’s a further radical idea that I think can and should be considered even though for many at first it appears that it is unAmerican in my view it is nothing of the sort.  In my view it is as American as apple pie and long since past due.

Are you ready?  We must pass a constitutional amendment to give sixteen and seventeen--year-olds, the right to vote.  Not only must we “Let My People Go,” but we must give them the means to participate in public life as we did others who were unjustly enslaved after being given their freedom. It was realized that freedom without power doesn't mean freedom.

It is time to enact a post-civil war, like Amendment to give a new birth of freedom to our young people who have been deprived of it for far too long. We have imprisoned our children and we should feel ashamed. It is time to let them go.

We can modify the Constitutional Amendment so it captures something of American work ethic and sense of responsibility justice and fairness, We should make the right to vote for sixteen and seventeen-year-olds conditional on their receiving a high school diploma, if a US citizen earns a high school diploma before their 18th birthday then he or she can register and vote in the upcoming election. If not she or he must wait until their 18th birthday to participate in any, and all elections

I've decided to post this with some typos and grammar fixed but not entirely because I’d like to get the ideas up and out and it's almost 9 in the evening now here in NYC.  Please excuse all typos. I or others can and will fix them shortly. (Actually, I decided to try to fix most of them and I think I did a not too bad a job at that, hehe :)

Before I post this to my campaign’s website, maybe you are all still wondering why I would want to dedicate such legislation or an Amendment to my Dad. That's an important part of the story that I need to explain now so I will.


My Dad, just Joe to most who know him, has a challenging upbringing. Yeah, I know that's a famous story but my dad had his too. He never really talked about this much like never and I understand that a bit more now than I did years ago. I still don't condone silence about things, but my Dad was like a pet in a way, not so willing to share much really if he felt it wasn’t necessary which he often felt like it wasn’t. Could he have had more joy, love, pleasure, and connection if he did?  I think so, but I understand more about him now, like I said than I did before.

My Dad’s mom - my grandma Sarah - my Dad, and my grandma on my Dad’s side are both gone. May they rest in peace so I  hope no one in my larger family will feel like I'm disrespecting either of their memories in what I'm sharing with the world now. I think it's a worthy story and hopefully brings honor not dishonor to their memory.

My Dad’s Mom was legally blind and legally deaf, If this was hard on me as a grandson, unable to let my grandma know who I was or where I was unless I shouted in her ear, It has to be a whole lot harder for my dad when he was growing up, Not only could he not enjoy a typical mother’s well everything if you know what I mean,  I imagine she could not work much outside the home but she learned how to take care of the family cooking and clearing as best she could without two basic tools most of us take for granted. Try living without sight for just one day. Then try living without hearing for a second day. Try living without both for even a few hours, I teach a few students who are mute, and the challenges that such a disability presents are enormous all by themselves.

And then as far as I understand but, don't know so much about this, maybe someone can consider sharing more so we can learn more, hint hint. My dad was born when My grandfather who I never met was I think about 50. This means that my Dad was a fourteen-year-old when my grandpa was 64 and my grandma was blind and deaf. Get the picture.  My Dad’s sister was a few years younger, she also has passed away and I don't have anything particular to say about her except that she was a few years younger than my dad, and from what I understand my Dad had to take care of his family beginning at the ripe old age of somewhere between 14 and 16, and needed to continue to do this until well his Mom was able to find a place to live on her own which she did with support from the government, his dad passed away and or his sister to find her way to become independent which she did when she got married, I don't know the details there. I'm sorry to all for that.

Now if this sounds challenging wait until you hear more about my father, the Superman, hope you are ok with this so far Mom. My father graduated high school two years early at the ripe old age of 16 and started studying physics at CCNY where he completed his degree at age 20.

If my Dad did this with a blind and deaf mom and a dad who was in his 60s during his teenage years and 60s back in the 50s wasn't like being in your 60s today. Is it possible that today's kids with the technology they have and all the rest is it possible that maybe they can do it too?

That's a wrap for tonight. I'll go out for a walk, For those who are reading, I hope you are enjoying my work and that it is giving you some food for thought. For those who haven't been reading, I hope you also enjoy your evening.

Good night from Astoria, Queens

just around 10 pm (really time for a walk now. Three plus hours of writing will do it to you every time.)

Good Will Hunting Part 2 - Robin Williams and Geography

Believe it or not, I was just doing some thinking as I frequently do, just letting some ideas, thoughts, feelings, etc., roll around in my mind for a bit, sometimes twist or turn them a bit and see what happens, and I came to think about one of my favorite movies - a movie I show a lot of people, introduce to a lot of people, students and more recently friends, and family members sometimes too who haven’t seen it or don’t remember it so well: Good Will Hunting with, well Robin Williams.  Yeah, there are other guys and gals in the movie, but Robin Williams, if I have a popular, star hero who is or was alive or was alive, he is it, or he is at least one at the very top of the list. I think I can speak for many of us by saying we miss you Robin, and hope you are doing well. Thank you for all you left behind for us.  There are so many treasures that you gave us - left behind for us - so, so many of them.

To me, Robin wasn’t just a funny guy, a brilliant comedic genius, as if I have to tell anyone that - his movies are about humanity, kindness, hope, truth - speaking truth to power wherever that power is, wherever that power holds us back, institutions states  - maybe most importantly of all - our, own fear.  And then I started thinking,  wouldn’t it be interesting to have a Good Will Hunting Part 2 to learn what a genius of extraordinary talent and power would choose to do? What would someone with almost unlimited ability want to do in this world?  Now, we all don’t have such unlimited ability or power like Mr. Good Will Hunting, so let’s bring it down a notch so we are talking to each other grounded down here on earth in reality.  Doesn’t the film ask us what we would choose to do if we could do anything we wanted anything, at all, if we had unlimited or almost unlimited power, unlimited resources to pursue any goal, any lifestyle, any dream of our choice, even if we weren’t as clever or as gifted as Will Hunting was?  What would you choose to do if like Good Will Hunting you had the ability, the power, and the money to do anything you wanted? Don’t we all - can’t we all - take that lesson from Good Will Hunting? 

Now, for someone like Will, the answer might be something we can’t imagine, but we can wonder. Would he choose to use his power to “just enjoy himself and his life Skylar, playing games here, there, and everywhere laughing himself to death toying with anything and everything if ever so kindly as he could, or would he choose something else? As I think about the movie, and Will’s character, I tend to think a life of pleasure-seeking, isn’t what Will would have chosen?  It just doesn’t seem to match Will’s character as it's presented in the movie. Some believe that “Kindness is the Highest Form of Intelligence.” If that is true and Will was the genius of his time, wouldn’t he have selected something kind to do with his time on earth?  What kind of kindness would equate with an intelligence of that level? Maybe Will would have run for President? I wonder what the movie maker who I just “searched up” as my students would say, Gus Van Sant, would have predicted?  Hey Gus, want to make a Good Will Hunting Part 2? It might be an even greater challenge than making Good Will Hunting Part One because it’s really kind of scary to think about what someone with Will’s level of intelligence could do for the world if, as some believe, Kindness is the Highest Form of Intelligence.

I’ll stop there. I didn’t actually get to what I planned to write this evening/morning, but it’s almost 5:30 am now,  and I’ve been up since 2:30 am. I think for now I’ve written enough. I’ll return to finish this topic another time.  But maybe just briefly, I could finish it here quickly. If I could do anything I wanted, maybe not for all of my time, but for maybe just a few hours a week, I’d teach a course at Columbia University in the Great City of New York entitled Robin Williams and Geography, and through it, try to bring a passion for the world to my students through the eyes, the love, and the humanity of one of our great national treasures, Robin Williams. May he rest in peace.

Good night/ morning again from Astoria Queens

5:30am 

Friday, December 15, 2023

Make it stand out

The Good, the Bad and, the I’m Sorry -  Part 1, This is really more like part 1a. I told you I needed some hours for this.

Good, The Bad, and, the I’m Sorry, Part 1a (December 15, 2023 - 11:55 am)

For those who had time to read my first in a series of articles on education reform for the twenty-first century, this is the second.  I’m not sure how many I will write over the next 7-10 days, but I imagine it will be about 4-5 maybe even a few more. Today’s is particularly important because of how radical a departure from current policy the suggestion I made yesterday was Today’s article should relax those who think that yesterday’s suggestion for reform was a mere flight of fancy.  It was not.  Yesterday’s focus was on how structural reforms need to be implemented to allow seventeen and eighteen-year-old  (non-children - there’s a term for you,) the right to graduate early from high school if they meet the requirements that each state demands.  Remember educational authority in the US is different from almost any other major nation because unlike almost any other country (scholars can check on this I’m not sure if this is fully accurate, but I don’t have time at the moment), ours is a federal system and education is not under the authority of the Federal government. It is under the authority of each state government and this is not necessarily, a bad thing for the same reason that it is not necessarily a bad thing for states to have the power to make decisions that they think meet their unique conditions. More on that in a moment, need to transition elsewhere and then come back. 

For political scientists out there I hope you are all having some fun. For others, welcome to Poli Sci 101. I will divert for a moment from this boring and dry structural analysis of this and that gobbledygook to give a special shoutout to a very important, even I would dare say, the single most significant individual in my political education The one person who more than any other, sorry Dad, taught me about politics and the world, who introduced me and countless others, not thousands or tens of thousands of students, but now probably hundreds of thousands of students. I just “searched him up” and saw that he just offered the commencement speech at his university. [I didn’t have time to follow him and his work. I was too busy doing my own.] to the term “developing country” which I had never heard before. I had no idea that poor or, “Third World countries, as they were sometimes called, were the norm. That America and the famous, western countries that so many long to see: France, the UK, Italy, Spain, Germany, Switzerland and Holland, and the like were unusual, even highly so, Whaaaaaaaat? Come again. I thought I was in the Twilight Zone and I never really even watched the Twilight Zone.   No one had ever told me this before. Some, I dare say most Americans who are either not immigrants or whose parents came from the above-mentioned countries may still have never learned this and I think this is a big part of the problem, a big big part. And one that needs to be corrected, and soon in our educational system. Kids even young kids I think need to learn about this. Unless we want to keep our kids children forever. The 1619 debate is really about this, isn’t it? Critical race theory is really, just about this, isn’t it? It asks us, the grown-ups, the adults in the room in our society a simple question but profound question, quite possibly the most profound question any parent has to answer: How soon is too soon? When do I want my child’s childhood to end? Because as we know, ignorance really, is bliss. Isn’t it? The carefree life of children, is there anything more magical more joyous, more beautiful under God’s blue sky than watching children play, then holding our children’s hands before they know what’s ahead of them? Isn’t this why grandparents so desperately want grandchildren so they can be reminded of their ignorance and enjoy time with people who are as ignorantly blissful as they were decades ago?

I have a lesson to teach soon so I am going to stop here and make some corrections and then come back this afternoon after a lunch break and keep on working. I digress some as you can see because this is supposed to be fun for me too at least, don’t you think?  If it’s only a grind and doesn’t bring me some pleasure then I’m not really, acting like a human being and I should.

And yes I know I didn’t tell you who that guy was yet. Hehe,  I’m so sneaky, eh? Stay tuned....

As if anyone is reading this or anyone cares? I really, don’t know yet, but we’ll find out one day.

———————————————————————————————————————————————————

Foreign policy vs. Education policy vs Health policy vs fiscal policy vs monetary policy

To reiterate a bit, to help me and you and any reader jump back into this stuff, let’s ask THE critical question once again: At one point, at what age, do we want our kids to grow up?  Is there a more profound question in social policy? If there is, I don’t know what it is and this is what makes education policy the most political of all issues.  Foreign policy is the most important policy for the absolute security of our nation. Without existence, we can’t have health. For this reason when it comes right down to it, those on the left, right, and center can usually come together, at least for the time being; time being defined here as the most critical period, the period when “the nation” determines that the absolute security of the nation - or its interests - are at risk. But for the internal health of our nation - the long-term strength of the nation m- education policy reigns supreme. It, more, than any policy, including health care policy, and certainly far more than fiscal or monetary policy matters more to the long-term real health of the nation. So if we get this right, even if just get it “righter,” markets will soar. Yeah, I’m not kidding.

[I decided to publish this small part on FB right now. I’ll add it to my campaign’s website later.] 

Education Policy, the Challenge of Federalism, and the goal of the politician

In the US, however, educational policy, because we live under a federal constitutional structure,  falls under the jurisdiction of the states.  This presents enormous challenges for national leaders who wish to make a difference in the most important social policy of all. WOW - Deep Farbs. Thanks, Alex.  We sometimes think that health care is the most political and important of all social (social and domestic) policies, but I dare disagree.  Most of us agree on what being healthy means, but it gets much more complicated when it comes to certain aspects of health care - particularly abortion, but there are others.  People fundamentally disagree on this issue and that is unlikely to change any time soon or ever. The challenge for leaders, political leaders called politicians - is to find the right political position as un-politically popular as it will surely be right in the ideological center. This is true for any leader who wants to be successful, who has to manage and lead actual people - not just for politicians - political leaders answerable to the nation, or the public whichever term you prefer here.  For local politicians to their locality. For state politicians, to their state. For national politicians to the or their nation. There is no higher legal authority than that. The UN does not hold authority. It only holds authority when its members give it authority. For this reason, all real politicians understand the US to be an actor that can help or sometimes hurt, but not an actor that can ever or should ever be relied upon for well just about anything. We all know this in our hearts but sometimes wish it were otherwise.

Politics is not perfection. It is not idealism. It is the art of the possible, as Otto von Bismark rightly noted, and understood by politicians since time immemorial.  For essentially this reason people hate politicians and will almost always do so. They prefer in some ways, but maybe not in others, that people either agree with them - see their logic as being right and true or that people disagree with them and state so honestly clearly, and truthfully Honesty is the best policy we are told.  In politics this is also true, but how one frames the question or issue at hand at a given time and place is what truly matters.  Framing the issue in the right way so the answer given is both factually true and politically true - this is the challenge of politics. Saying what is objectively right and true as if such a thing exists in a changing world  - the last time I checked time doesn’t stop and it’s a good thing too or we’d all be dead - and with 8 billion perspectives alive and well and circulating faster than anyone ever imagined just a short time ago,  I dare ask anyone to define the objective truth about almost anything, When and if a person realizes or accepts this reality, then politics begins.  Idealists or activists play a role, but they never should never lead any true political entity answerable to the public.  They don’t think to act responsibly. They seek to change a polity’s thinking or feeling, and while that work should be valued, respected, and even encouraged, it should never be confused with leadership - the task of responsibility.

[These sections written from about 6 pm to about 8 pm Friday, December 16, 2023.]

The Great Wonders of the World, Trash, Gossip and Pride — December 16, 2023 4:40 am

An Intro

Ok as usual I’m taking another departure, digressing again from the main topic of education reform to explore another one. This one came to me a few days ago, and I was just stirring it around in my mind, twisting it and turning it, flipping it over and over, and around, again and again (as I remember once John Locke described in something I read ages ago. Looking for connections and combinations until I notice something or observe something that seems true - true in the purest sense of the word - a kind of uncorrupted truth - a truth that is entirely distinct from what we are told to think and believe about something, but really, true as the Brandeis University motto a Jewish secular co-educational university founded in 1948 states “truth even unto its inner-most parts”.  

I’m not a Brandeisian, but I know someone who is. This person studied, majored, I think even a deep topic, a very, deep topic, “The History of Western Thought.” I think he must have been learning about the great thinkers and thoughts of Western civilization and culture while I was learning about the developing countries in the Third World as an undergrad at Binghamton, the “public school Brandeis.” I won’t reveal the identity of this person until and unless I get permission. Frankly, its identity is not important.  Many people will gossip. This won’t change and sadly because it’s one of the worst parts of human nature - one of the seven deadly sins. - And, Maybe all this comes to my mind because gossip, the slandering of the truth is precisely the opposite of Brandeis’ motto “truth even unto its inner-most parts” and it is just this juxtaposition that I think helps me feel I am ready to tell the story I planned to tell over an hour ago when I started writing, and now need a break to take it easy. Right CN? No hurry. Step by step.

The Story